Springe direkt zu Inhalt

Guido Rohmann

Alumnus

Adresse
Lansstraße 5-9
14195 Berlin

Research Interests

  • Voting Behavior
  • Political Polarization
  • Welfare State Regimes
  • US Economy
  • US Domestic Politics
  • Transatlantic Relations

Education

10/2018 - 11/2024

Dissertation in Political Science (successfully completed)

Graduate School of North American Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

10/2014 – 02/2017

Master of Arts in North American Studies

Concentration in Political Science and Economics

John-F.-Kennedy-Institut, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

Thesis: “Mobilizing the Margins – Populist Mobilization and the Success of Donald

Trump and Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Primary Elections”

Advisors: Christian Lammert, Irwin Collier

10/2008 – 09/2012

Bachelor of Arts in English Studies (major) and Politics and Society (minor)

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Germany

Thesis: “Party Organizations, Constituency, Interest Groups and their Influence on the

Polarization of State Parliaments”

Advisors: Henrike Viehrig, Christian Klöckner

09/2010 – 06/2011

Erasmus Exchange

University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

Summer Schools

07/2012 – 08/2012

“America in the 21st Century: Crises, Challenges and Chances”, Freie Universität Berlin International Summer and Winter University (FUBiS), Germany

Examining the Roots of Political Discontent: The “Left Behind” Theory in the Context of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election (Dissertationt)

Mentoring Team:
First supervisor: Prof. Dr. Christian Lammert
Second supervisor: Prof. Dr. Boris Vormann
Third supervisor: Prof. Dr. Rainer Danielzyk

The growing popularity of anti-establishment parties and politicians among voters in Western democracies since the mid-2010s has led to a number of explanations. One widely accepted approach, both in journalistic and academic circles, is the theory that the "left behind" voters are primarily responsible for this development. Despite the popularity of this
secondly, a lack of empirical testing.

This dissertation addresses these problems using the 2016 U.S. presidential election as an example. Based on an examination of media and academic discourse, an empirically testable definition of the theory is distilled, operationalized, and then empirically tested at the county level through two regression models. The results of the analysis show that the chosen operationalization of the theory can explain approximately two-thirds of the variance in the vote share for Donald Trump. In order to understand the proportion of unexplained variance, counties in which Trump's share of the vote as predicted by the statistical models deviates significantly from the actual vote are then examined in descriptive analysis in exploratory form. It becomes clear that the reasons for the strong deviations lie less in the selection of the chosen variables, but probably in their lack of weighting, as well as in other factors such as voter turnout and historical loyalty to a party.

The dissertation places this empirical research in a broader context by viewing Trump's election as a symptom of a transitional phase between two political paradigms. Both by adopting this perspective and through the empirical aspects of the work, this dissertation contributes to a better understanding of the origins of Trump's electoral success and opens up new ways to address them.

Konferenzen

3/2019 "Geographies of Discontent: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations", Heidelberg Spring Academy, Heidelberg Center for American Studies, Universität Heidelberg, Germany
11/2018 "Geographies of Discontent: A Research Proposal", Annual Meeting of the Political Science Section of the German Association for American Studies, Universität Passau, Germany
Dahlem Research School
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
banner_daad_de
banner_edp-einstein